<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Consumer Institute&#8217;s endorsement scheme still flying under the radar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stoppress.co.nz/news/2010/02/consumer-endorsement-scheme-still-flying-under-the-radar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stoppress.co.nz/news/2010/02/consumer-endorsement-scheme-still-flying-under-the-radar/</link>
	<description>Breaking news from New Zealand Marketing magazine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 00:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.stoppress.co.nz/news/2010/02/consumer-endorsement-scheme-still-flying-under-the-radar/comment-page-1/#comment-2513</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:35:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stoppress.co.nz/?p=6611#comment-2513</guid>
		<description>I really wonder about Consumer&#039;s indeopendence anyhow. They may not be allied to any commercial organisation - but they do have an agenda judging by the very poor &quot;lets jump to these conclusions&quot; report I read based on one of their studies. The report in question, leapt miles away from their mystery shopper observations to then make sweeping recommendations about the industry in question. Reading I thought two things. 1) This is bad research, and wouldn&#039;t pass muster in my profession - Market Research. 2) Me-thought that somebody in Consumer wants to be heard at a select committee somewhere. 

You can&#039;t be independent when your agenda is political; any more than if your agenda is brazenly commercial.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really wonder about Consumer&#39;s indeopendence anyhow. They may not be allied to any commercial organisation &#8211; but they do have an agenda judging by the very poor &quot;lets jump to these conclusions&quot; report I read based on one of their studies. The report in question, leapt miles away from their mystery shopper observations to then make sweeping recommendations about the industry in question. Reading I thought two things. 1) This is bad research, and wouldn&#39;t pass muster in my profession &#8211; Market Research. 2) Me-thought that somebody in Consumer wants to be heard at a select committee somewhere. </p>
<p>You can&#39;t be independent when your agenda is political; any more than if your agenda is brazenly commercial.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
